Blog

Apr 2, 2026

The Trust Layer: What a Responsible Prediction Market Must Prove Before It Scales

Prediction markets have already built the speed layer: liquidity bursts, headlines, fast-moving contracts, and viral attention. What they still have to prove is the trust layer. A market that wants to scale responsibly must show not only that people want to trade it, but that the venue is governable, the contracts are defensible, the rules are visible, and ordinary users are not being asked to underprice hidden structural risk.

Read more →

Mar 26, 2026

The 2026 Prediction Market Reality Check: Growth, Hype and Structural Fragility

Prediction markets are no longer a niche experiment. They are growing fast, attracting capital, drawing mainstream attention, and forcing regulators to respond. But 2026 also reveals a harder truth: growth is real, yet much of the market still rests on fragile liquidity, sports-driven volume, unresolved legal boundaries, and an integrity framework that remains under construction.

Read more →

Mar 24, 2026

Inside Information Is Not a Side Issue: It Is the Trust Test for Prediction Markets

Prediction markets cannot scale on the promise of better information while ignoring the question of who is allowed to trade on unfairly better information. Inside information is not a side issue. It is the line between a market that aggregates knowledge and a market that quietly rewards privileged access.

Read more →

Mar 23, 2026

Should War Markets Exist? Yes, but Only Under the Hardest Integrity Standard

War markets are the most uncomfortable category in prediction markets, but discomfort alone is not a sufficient argument for prohibition. The real question is whether these markets can exist under a surveillance, eligibility, and sanctions regime strong enough to prevent insider abuse, coercion, and structurally corrupt trading.

Read more →

Mar 21, 2026

Arizona vs. Kalshi: The First Criminal Case That Changes the Conversation

Prediction markets have spent months fighting state regulators in civil court. Arizona just changed the tone. By filing criminal charges against Kalshi, the state turned a jurisdiction dispute into a far more serious test of whether federally regulated event contracts can still trigger state criminal exposure.

Read more →