An initiative of responsiblo
Predict responsibly .
Blog

Insights on responsible prediction markets.

Regulation trackers, structural analysis and plain-language explainers, written for people who have to decide something, not for the feed.

All Industry News Education Platform Reviews Regulation
Five Member States Gave ESMA Something Other Than Yes Regulation 31 Oct 2026 Five Member States Gave ESMA Something Other Than Yes Whether a yes or no contract is a financial instrument decides which European rulebook a venue lives under, and that question is answered one Member State at a time. ESMA said so in its own executive summary, then published the table showing what the answers are. As of 17 July 2026 five of the twenty seven national columns do not read yes, two Member States have no designated authority, and Denmark wrote down that another regulator's classification is input rather than an answer. Read more → The Referral Fee Question Was Settled in 1983 and Then Reopened Regulation 23 Oct 2026 The Referral Fee Question Was Settled in 1983 and Then Reopened A partner paid for the accounts it sends to a prediction market is either a marketing channel or an intermediary, and the venue does not get to pick. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission answered the compensation question in 1983, its staff drew a six part line around it in 2004, and on 17 September 2026 that line moved far enough to name event contracts. What changed is not whether a paid partner may solicit. What changed is what has to be on file if it does. Read more → What Separates an Event Contract From the Wager Next Door? Regulation 20 Oct 2026 What Separates an Event Contract From the Wager Next Door? On 19 October 2026 the CFTC published two documents at once. One takes licensed casino gambling out of the swap definition and is already in force. The other would write event contracts into it and is only a proposal. The published preamble names five ways the two products differ, and every one of them is a statement about how a venue is run rather than about what happens to the person trading on it. Read more → Nobody Charged the Fifteen Brokers That Took the U.S. Trades Regulation 18 Oct 2026 Nobody Charged the Fifteen Brokers That Took the U.S. Trades The question this category keeps asking is whether a regulator can really reach a venue that sits offshore. Two settled orders from June 2026 answer it from an unexpected direction. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission charged the firm that built the platforms, held the customer money and took the other side of the trades, plus the affiliate that screened the customers. The fifteen branded brokers that took the trades were charged with nothing. Read more → Congress Added Judicial Review to the Emergency Power in 1983 Regulation 14 Oct 2026 Congress Added Judicial Review to the Emergency Power in 1983 One sentence in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's order of 14 July 2026 says the merits of an emergency determination are precluded from judicial review. It quotes a Seventh Circuit holding from 1979 about a wheat contract. Three years later Congress rewrote the same paragraph of the Commodity Exchange Act and inserted judicial review into it. Here is what that sentence rests on, what the 1983 amendment changed, and what an exchange can write down while the question stays open. Read more → The Exchange Won the Preemption Point and Lost on the Product Regulation 10 Oct 2026 The Exchange Won the Preemption Point and Lost on the Product Kalshi spent a year arguing about who regulates its markets, won that argument in the Ninth Circuit on 28 August 2026, and lost anyway because the panel held its sports event contracts are not swaps. The Sixth Circuit agreed on 25 September. On 9 October the CFTC moved to fix the definition by rule, and drew the line around the venue rather than the product. Classification is now a filing obligation, not a theory. Read more → Baltimore Sued on Its Own Ordinance While the State Waited Regulation 9 Oct 2026 Baltimore Sued on Its Own Ordinance While the State Waited On 13 August 2026 the City of Baltimore sued Kalshi, Polymarket and three brokerages in its own circuit court, under its own consumer protection ordinance, through its own City Solicitor. Maryland's gaming regulator had already agreed to hold off on enforcement pending appeal, and none of that bound the city. The jurisdictional map an event contract has to survive carries a municipal layer, and almost nobody has drawn it. Read more → The Listing Test Arrived Fifty-Three Days After the Order Regulation 3 Oct 2026 The Listing Test Arrived Fifty-Three Days After the Order KalshiEX listed a contract on whether George Santos would attend the 2026 State of the Union on 22 January 2026. He traded both sides of it. The CFTC settled a manipulation case on 31 July 2026, and on 22 September 2026 the Division of Market Oversight published the listing test that the contract would have had to pass. The order and the advisory describe the same design flaw from opposite ends, and only one of them arrives before money is at risk. Read more → The Contract Was Legal Until the Buyer Stood on Tribal Land Regulation 28 Sep 2026 The Contract Was Legal Until the Buyer Stood on Tribal Land Exchanges keep a jurisdiction map with a federal layer and a state layer. On 16 September 2026 the Ninth Circuit added a third one, held that the Commodity Exchange Act does not displace the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act on Indian lands, and made the decisive fact the buyer's physical position. The new layer is measured in parcels. Read more → Fourteen Governance Rules Went In and Three Came Back Smaller Regulation 24 Sep 2026 Fourteen Governance Rules Went In and Three Came Back Smaller A CFTC proposal on exchange governance was published in March 2024, withdrawn in September 2025 and partly revived in August 2026. Reading the two documents against each other shows which requirements never came back, and what a prediction market can adopt without waiting. Read more → The Regulator Would See Four Hundred Traders Instead of a Million Regulation 20 Sep 2026 The Regulator Would See Four Hundred Traders Instead of a Million Most of the 2026 argument about prediction markets has been about whether they may exist and who gets to decide. A quieter Federal Register document settles something else: how much of what happens inside them anyone outside will ever see. The CFTC proposed it on 1 July 2026, took comments for thirty days, and has not finished it. Its reporting thresholds would cut the number of traders the Commission routinely sees from more than a million to about four hundred. Read more → The Commission Left the Requirements Box Empty Until 30 September Regulation 9 Sep 2026 The Commission Left the Requirements Box Empty Until 30 September The European Commission has a section on prediction markets in its MiCA review, and the question that matters in it has no answer options at all. It asks what substantive requirements should apply to firms running these venues. The box is empty, the deadline is 30 September 2026, and whatever the industry does not write there will be written by someone else. Read more →
More articles